ENLIGHTENMENT RHETORIC
(based on student presentations)
By
Charles Allen
_________________________________
The Enlightenment was a period in European history that
occurred from the 17th through the eighteenth century that was marked by
scientific, political as philosophical revolutions. As these revolutions altered established notions regarding
the physical world, human nature, society, and knowledge and truth, respective
persons in the fields of science, philosophy, and politics began to institute
new ideas as the scientific method surfaced by scientists, closer attention was
paid to psychological processes of reflection and perception, and democracy
became the natural form of organization. Subsequently,
language, communication and rhetoric experienced changes in the way in which
rhetoric was understood and accepted.
The philosophical and scientific revolutions which occurred
affected the conception of logic as logic was considered to be the discipline
which sought truth and this was supported by the Ramistic doctrines that
dominated rhetoric which particularly affected style and delivery as it argued
that invention and arrangement were really concerned with logic.
In the sciences, inductive reasoning substituted for deductive logic and
a development for a standard of inquiry came into play.
As the Ramistic doctrine came into play, the Ciceronian conception of
rhetoric which included all five canons, invention, arrangement, style, memory,
and delivery found its way back to serving as the foundation of rhetorical study
and remained in this position through the period of the Enlightenment.
At the beginning of the Enlightenment, Francis Bacon had an
insightful influence on rhetoric as his theory of psychology divided the mind
into productive and receptive operations which he specifically identified as
faculties which allowed focus to be on the appealing of these faculties in order
to encourage the act of persuasion. What
followed was the elocution movement which targeted its efforts on accurate and
powerful delivery and correct pronunciation in a period which was enthralled in
correctness. This influence later
was credited with analyzing the nonverbal appeals to the emotions.
John Locke
Hope
Christler
John Locke’s perspective stands opposed to the traditional doctrines of received truth, innate ideas, and the presumption that direct knowledge is available through revelation or perception as he agreed with Bacon that there is an external world and that if knowledge of it is possible but only if we understand the processes by which we come to such knowledge we have direct knowledge only of our ideas and we have direct sensations, but we know only the ideas of these sensations as we reflect upon primary ideas caused by sensory perception forms of others. |
David Hume
Arlethia
Brown & Tia Bradshaw
In 1739 Hume published “A Treatise of Human Nature” which combined Lockean Empiricism, a view that emphasizes experience through the use of the senses and is the only source of knowledge and Newtonian Experimentalism which uses experimental methods to determine the validity of ideas. |
Giambattista Vico
Jonah
J. Hooper
This
rhetorician believed that rhetoric provided a superior philosophy of
knowledge as all knowledge was based on argument and conviction. These beliefs contrasted with Descartes as Vico spoke out
on the principles of Descartes regarding education. |
Mary Astell
Aricia
Haris & Syreeta Mason
Astell
felt that men and women were intellectually equal which supports her
belief that women should study every subject men studied in addition to
the feeling that the best protection for women lay in a hierarchical
social order in which all relationships were infused with a split of
Christian love. |
Hugh BlairDesmond
J. Killings & Jeffrey Guiste
Blair
intended to craft an approach to rhetoric that would preserve classical
goals amid changing social conditions and new developments in knowledge as
his rhetoric aimed to produce good men who would speak out and write well
in the service of the community whether for the pulpit, the bar, or the
halls of legislature as he did not stress eloquence and style |
Although Rene Descartes would indefinitely
highlight the thoughts of Bacon, it was Bacon who argued that rhetoric applies
reason to the imagination to move the will.
He believed that reasoning was not enough to achieve persuasion, but that
people had to be taught or moved through action and did not abandon altogether
the use of harsh words for the rhetoric of tropes and figures.
Conclusively, Francis Bacon disavowed the art of eloquence.
Bacon’s strength allowed him to draw a distinction between
investigation, which is the job of logic and invention as he — like the neo-Ciceronians
– persistently guarded classical rhetoric from Ramistic assault through the
restoration of invention to rhetoric. Descartes,
in accordance with Bacon’s efforts, elevated syllogism and the usual places
into the spectrum of rhetoric as he defined the investigative method as a
process of building on self-evident truths by careful addition as a builder,
sequential addition as a scientist, and the search for casual connection as a
social scientist.
Even as the political, philosophical, and
scientific revolutions occurred, the genres of poetry, history, and literary
criticism (belles letters) became associated with traditional rhetoric.
During this period, critics began to see literature as purposeful, poetry
as perfectly connected with persuasion, and psychology and human nature as
confirmation of the idea that imagination and reasoning were essential mental
faculties. It must not be forgotten
however, that traditional rhetoric experienced an attack by proponents of the
new science who believed that rhetoric was ornamented by vivid language rather
than plain language. In order to
come to some compromise, members of this period in rhetoric began to see a
fomentation in the language of preeminent religious and literary leaders as they
began to use perspicuity (clarity) in discussions.
As the transition was made into Eighteenth
Century Rhetoric, the relationship between language and knowledge would become a
major concern as semantics, epistemology, and semantics would arise.
Innumerable definitions regarding philosophy would emerge as Giambattista
Vico, Destutt de Tracy and Joseph Priestly would contribute greatly to the rules
of language as a sub-component. Uniformity
would become a priority and order would inevitably become the wave of the future
as Scottish clergyman and academic George Campbell would institute thoughts to
understand the movement of the human mind.
This would only be complemented by Hugh Blair’s Epistemology and Bell
Lettres. Education would soar to
new heights as women were afforded the opportunity to learn and the great ides
of the Enlightenment, empiricism, rationalism, and psychology found a residence
in rhetoric and this period would later be ascribed the period in which rules
were formulated for natural composition, speech, and for judging works.