ENLIGHTENMENT RHETORIC

(based on  student presentations)

By

Charles Allen

_________________________________

 

 

The Enlightenment was a period in European history that occurred from the 17th through the eighteenth century that was marked by scientific, political as philosophical revolutions.  As these revolutions altered established notions regarding the physical world, human nature, society, and knowledge and truth, respective persons in the fields of science, philosophy, and politics began to institute new ideas as the scientific method surfaced by scientists, closer attention was paid to psychological processes of reflection and perception, and democracy became the natural form of organization.  Subsequently, language, communication and rhetoric experienced changes in the way in which rhetoric was understood and accepted.

 

The philosophical and scientific revolutions which occurred affected the conception of logic as logic was considered to be the discipline which sought truth and this was supported by the Ramistic doctrines that dominated rhetoric which particularly affected style and delivery as it argued that invention and arrangement were really concerned with logic.  In the sciences, inductive reasoning substituted for deductive logic and a development for a standard of inquiry came into play.  As the Ramistic doctrine came into play, the Ciceronian conception of rhetoric which included all five canons, invention, arrangement, style, memory, and delivery found its way back to serving as the foundation of rhetorical study and remained in this position through the period of the Enlightenment.

 

At the beginning of the Enlightenment, Francis Bacon had an insightful influence on rhetoric as his theory of psychology divided the mind into productive and receptive operations which he specifically identified as faculties which allowed focus to be on the appealing of these faculties in order to encourage the act of persuasion.  What followed was the elocution movement which targeted its efforts on accurate and powerful delivery and correct pronunciation in a period which was enthralled in correctness.  This influence later was credited with analyzing the nonverbal appeals to the emotions.

John Locke

Hope Christler

John Locke’s perspective stands opposed to the traditional doctrines of received truth, innate ideas, and the presumption that direct knowledge is available through revelation or perception as he agreed with Bacon that there is an external world and that if knowledge of it is possible but only if we understand the processes by which we come to such knowledge we have direct knowledge only of our ideas and we have direct sensations, but we know only the ideas of these sensations as we reflect upon primary ideas caused by sensory perception forms of others.

 

David Hume

Arlethia Brown & Tia Bradshaw

In 1739 Hume published “A Treatise of Human Nature” which combined Lockean Empiricism, a view that emphasizes experience through the use of the senses and is the only source of knowledge and Newtonian Experimentalism which uses experimental methods to determine the validity of ideas.

 

Giambattista Vico

Jonah J. Hooper

This rhetorician believed that rhetoric provided a superior philosophy of knowledge as all knowledge was based on argument and conviction.  These beliefs contrasted with Descartes as Vico spoke out on the principles of Descartes regarding education.

 

Mary Astell

Aricia Haris & Syreeta Mason

Astell felt that men and women were intellectually equal which supports her belief that women should study every subject men studied in addition to the feeling that the best protection for women lay in a hierarchical social order in which all relationships were infused with a split of Christian love.

Hugh Blair

Desmond J. Killings & Jeffrey Guiste

Blair intended to craft an approach to rhetoric that would preserve classical goals amid changing social conditions and new developments in knowledge as his rhetoric aimed to produce good men who would speak out and write well in the service of the community whether for the pulpit, the bar, or the halls of legislature as he did not stress eloquence and style

 

Although Rene Descartes would indefinitely highlight the thoughts of Bacon, it was Bacon who argued that rhetoric applies reason to the imagination to move the will.  He believed that reasoning was not enough to achieve persuasion, but that people had to be taught or moved through action and did not abandon altogether the use of harsh words for the rhetoric of tropes and figures.  Conclusively, Francis Bacon disavowed the art of eloquence.  Bacon’s strength allowed him to draw a distinction between investigation, which is the job of logic and invention as he — like the neo-Ciceronians – persistently guarded classical rhetoric from Ramistic assault through the restoration of invention to rhetoric.  Descartes, in accordance with Bacon’s efforts, elevated syllogism and the usual places into the spectrum of rhetoric as he defined the investigative method as a process of building on self-evident truths by careful addition as a builder, sequential addition as a scientist, and the search for casual connection as a social scientist.

 

Even as the political, philosophical, and scientific revolutions occurred, the genres of poetry, history, and literary criticism (belles letters) became associated with traditional rhetoric.  During this period, critics began to see literature as purposeful, poetry as perfectly connected with persuasion, and psychology and human nature as confirmation of the idea that imagination and reasoning were essential mental faculties.  It must not be forgotten however, that traditional rhetoric experienced an attack by proponents of the new science who believed that rhetoric was ornamented by vivid language rather than plain language.  In order to come to some compromise, members of this period in rhetoric began to see a fomentation in the language of preeminent religious and literary leaders as they began to use perspicuity (clarity) in discussions.

 

As the transition was made into Eighteenth Century Rhetoric, the relationship between language and knowledge would become a major concern as semantics, epistemology, and semantics would arise.  Innumerable definitions regarding philosophy would emerge as Giambattista Vico, Destutt de Tracy and Joseph Priestly would contribute greatly to the rules of language as a sub-component.  Uniformity would become a priority and order would inevitably become the wave of the future as Scottish clergyman and academic George Campbell would institute thoughts to understand the movement of the human mind.  This would only be complemented by Hugh Blair’s Epistemology and Bell Lettres.  Education would soar to new heights as women were afforded the opportunity to learn and the great ides of the Enlightenment, empiricism, rationalism, and psychology found a residence in rhetoric and this period would later be ascribed the period in which rules were formulated for natural composition, speech, and for judging works.